High court gay marriage decisions due Wednesday
MARK SHERMAN, AP
WASHINGTON
(AP) — The Supreme Court is meeting to deliver opinions in two cases
that could dramatically alter the rights of gay people across the United
States.
The
justices are expected to decide their first-ever cases about gay
marriage Wednesday in their last session before the court's summer
break.
The
issues before the court are California's constitutional ban on same-sex
marriage and the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which denies legally
married gay Americans a range of tax,
health and pension benefits otherwise available to married couples.
The
broadest possible ruling would give gay Americans the same
constitutional right to marry as heterosexuals. But several narrower
paths also are available, including technical legal
outcomes in which the court could end up saying very little about
same-sex marriage.
If
the court overturns California's Proposition 8 or allows lower court
rulings that struck down the ban to stand, it will take about a month
for same-sex weddings to resume for the first
time since 2008, San Francisco officials have said.
The
high court rulings are arriving amid rapid change regarding gay
marriage. The number of states permitting same-sex partners to wed has
doubled from six to 12 in less than a year,
with voter approval in three states in November, followed by
legislative endorsement in three others in the spring.
At
the same time, an effort to legalize gay marriage in Illinois stalled
before the state's legislative session ended last month. And 30 states
have same-sex marriage bans enshrined in
their constitutions.
Massachusetts
was the first state to allow same-sex couples to marry, in 2004.
Same-sex marriage also is legal, or soon will be, in Connecticut,
Delaware, the District of Columbia, Iowa,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York,
Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
Roughly
18,000 same-sex couples got married in California in less than five
months in 2008, after the California Supreme Court struck down a state
code provision prohibiting gay unions.
California voters approved Proposition 8 in November of that year, writing the ban into the state's constitution.
Two same-sex couples challenged the provision as unconstitutional and federal courts in California agreed.
The
federal marriage law, known by its acronym DOMA, defines marriage as
between a man and a woman for the purpose of deciding who can receive a
range of federal benefits. Another provision
not being challenged for the time being allows states to withhold
recognition of same-sex marriages from other states.
DOMA easily passed Congress and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1996, the year of his re-election.
Several
federal district and appeals courts struck down the provision. In 2011,
the Obama administration abandoned its defense of the law but continued
to enforce it. House Republicans
are now defending DOMA in the courts. President Barack Obama
subsequently endorsed gay marriage in 2012.
The
justices chose for their review the case of 83-year-old Edith Windsor
of New York, who sued to challenge a $363,000 federal estate tax bill
after her partner of 44 years died in 2009.
Windsor,
who goes by Edie, married Thea Spyer in 2007 after doctors told them
Spyer would not live much longer. She suffered from multiple sclerosis
for many years. Spyer left everything
she had to Windsor.
Windsor would have paid nothing in inheritance taxes if she had been married to a man.
(I’ve
said it before and I’ll say it again, if folks want a few tax breaks
and an equal share at ending up in divorce court then why should anyone
stop them?)
No comments:
Post a Comment